Created on 2018-03-27 23:56
Published on 2018-03-28 00:28
. This to enable the rights of citizen James Martin Driskill within the body of mission work of Article 12 of the CRPD of his mental health provider interface to be "individualized" treatment -- options of self determination and atonomy are being denied. This in the interface of doctor care in psychiatry and therapy. The date of the proposals of international agreement proposals that the United States is a signature party is 2007. The year is 2018. This post holds links to outside correspondence attempts to get my rights enabled --- still to no avail.
I have completed an FCC Complaint because the denial of autonomy factors relates to the malformed policy to deny accessibility to use email standards to communicate to doctor and therapist. They wish to retain a standard that is old outdated and warned against possible abuse to coercion factors in this law discussion source of article 12, a 10 minute presentation.
This text that applies majorly offended and denied is posted to FCC COMPLAINT webfiled off their site at:
This has spoken voice text narrative interface.
I would prefer to leave this URL open to the main text body of this post.
Please call the FCC on behalf of this request# for them to follow through to the enforcement policy of enabling the rights of persons with disabilities upon the policy changes needed and amended at the County of San Bernardino full spectrum wide utilization of social services. it is an important clause within that article 12 discussion that makes this a matter of imperatives and importance.
It states:
"It aims to enable self direction or autonomy -- yes it works for that within a framework of support. So the last little bit in that slide, the last contract, goes to what I would term the relational effect of these two models. So whereas the substitute model has the effect of subjecting one suspicion and surveillance and ultimately coercion -- [ THAT IS THE ONE THAT IS IN PLACE CURRENTLY ]
This is a big package that I'm throwing together - The alternative model of supportive decision-making is meant to enhance relationships of respect and empowerment. So this sums up to the point.
Article 12 : What is supportive about it? I picked out a few things here.
That seems important from what we have seen so far. Second, it allows one to appoint someone who assist me, right, with making decisions as opposite to take over, in specific areas. It also allows me to appoint someone to take over in certain circumstances that this model does.
The act also states a test for capacity to make those appointments that's not rooted in the sort of cognitive capacities of understanding and so on that traditional models are so it goes to one's ability to express preferences [ in my case communication in email ] and trust.
So Think about the relevance of this and this is why it is drafted this way.
Can anybody help me secure my rights as a person with two different disabilities?
Federal Communications Commission/Customer service 1 (888) 225-5322
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi James,
Thank you for your submission. Your request has been received and assigned Ticket No. 2329046. Throughout the complaint process, you will receive periodic emails updating you about the status of your complaint.
If you have information to add to your complaint, please respond directly to this email.
You can view a list of frequently asked questions about the informal complaint process at: https://consumercomplaints.fcc.gov/hc/en-us/articles/205082880.
Your submission provides the FCC with important information we can use to develop policies to protect consumers, remedy violations of the Communications Act, and encourage future compliance with the law.
Thank you for your help in furthering the FCC’s mission on behalf of consumers.
-----------------------------
In the controversy of enabing rights for persons with disabilities in social services, I have found and discovered a hate conspiracy against a certain class of citizen's -- and these citzen's are being systematically subject to oppression perhaps survillance and monitoring by social services in the violation of online practices in social media --- yes we are dealing with that issue here. #ConspiracyExposed in HIV/AIDS social Services Ryan White Care Act agencies systemic showing on the employee reviews of these agencies nationally on the employee support side of employer / employee job searching. I am right. Please get the FCC to make sure they process these REQUESTS of COMPLAINT. Thank you.